tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8458786710697760224.post164644703619533319..comments2023-09-07T03:46:07.252-07:00Comments on Or Words to that Effect...: A bully is never remembered well...randyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16659230610436922709noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8458786710697760224.post-57869704618144986912011-11-04T20:32:37.609-07:002011-11-04T20:32:37.609-07:00Hi Sammy;
I've often thought that the concep...Hi Sammy;<br /> I've often thought that the concept of special circumstances, such as the hate legislation, is useless. It clouds the issue. The simple fact is that our laws are sufficient for the most part...it is the lack of expression of those laws that is the problem. A bully is assaulting someone...the rest is irrelevent. But, prejudice seems to require the extra kick just to get people to recognize that what isn't right just isn't right. go figure.<br />hugs;<br />randy.randyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16659230610436922709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8458786710697760224.post-15511762443388282672011-11-04T06:35:15.597-07:002011-11-04T06:35:15.597-07:00Hello Randy
So, basically, this new law is just li...Hello Randy<br />So, basically, this new law is just lip service, because there are no absolute standards - a bully or a bigot just needs to say that they were acting out of 'moral principle', and the law is so much waste paper. I wonder if that 'get-out clause' would be allowed if a gang of atheists bullied someone because they were Christian, or a gang of gay boys bullied a straight teen for being straight. I very much doubt it, because atheism and homosexuality are not accepted as moral by the sort of people who've introduced this heap of stinking hypocrisy. If Matt was still with us today, he'd be no safer in school than he was before. No wonder his father is incensed.<br /><br />Love & best wishes<br />Sammy BSammy Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11257879009293024225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8458786710697760224.post-11362069648915419022011-11-04T03:50:57.807-07:002011-11-04T03:50:57.807-07:00It seems you read that correctly, Nikki;
It see...It seems you read that correctly, Nikki;<br /><br /> It seems a throw to the republican constituents. To a point, I agree...to a point. It is a careful thing when we stifle free speach. But, if one is coming from a moral standpoint, then it appears one can tell another hurtful things and all is well with these Michigan Republican's little worlds. It's ludicrous that they would gut this law so. <br />hugs and keep hoping;<br />randyrandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16659230610436922709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8458786710697760224.post-86358121346140009692011-11-04T00:03:17.572-07:002011-11-04T00:03:17.572-07:00Randy,
I understood this correctly? "Bullies&...Randy,<br />I understood this correctly? "Bullies" get right if they have acted out of religious or moral grounds. What right is that? There will be double standards.<br />Until a few years ago it was common in Bavarian schools that in every classroom, a crucifix was hanging on the wall. When some parents complained in court, however, the court decided against the school. The crucifix must be removed according to the will of the parents from public school classrooms.<br />NikkiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com